Awaiting decision after minor revision template

Feb 28, 2021 · My paper underwent a revision. Major revision: The paper could be accepted after some significant changes. Answer: It is quite normal for a revised paper to be reviewed once again. Click the link to navigate to information on: Feb 5, 2022 · The status of the paper has since changed from "Under Review" to "Decision Pending", and recently, maybe 4 days ago, the status has changed to "Decision Pending Approval". Reject: The paper has been through the peer review process and the Action Jul 26, 2018 · Answer: Generally, papers that have received a request for major or minor revisions are sent for a second round of peer review. It is now about a month after resubmission and the status is “awaiting peer review and pending decision. Around the end of last year, the journal changed its chief editor who was responsible for my article. An email template will appear alerting the author that the decision has been rescinded. Sep 24, 2019 · Answer: I understand that you twice revised and resubmitted your paper twice. What this means, respectively, is that the journal This decision should take into consideration your own opinion of the submission as well as the general consensus of the refereeing committee. Also, ‘SAE’ perhaps stands for ‘Specialist Associate Editor. You should simply wait for the next update, which should happen fairly soon as the decision is awaiting the EIC’s approval. A summary of the editorial process is given in the A revision decision will cause the manuscript to appear in the "Manuscripts Awaiting Revision" area of the submitting author’s Author Center. Editors and reviewers would have gotten back a week or so ago, and still be catching up; a few may be yet to get back. Make edits to the text if desired, then click “Save and Send. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. If you know that in this journal (and you discipline) the papers are typically reviewed fast (e. , rejection, minor/major revisions; For those invited/encouraged for revisions, author submits revised paper to the journal followed by a further review cycle; Final decision made by EIC; Publication upon paper acceptance. Revisions of papers with a "Minor revision" should be resubmitted with a month. ) The checklist TIE checklist for manuscript submissions also applies to the revised stage. Minor revisions should be verified by the AE and not sent back to the reviewers. Customise the email template and send your congratulations. Jul 18, 2019 · I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. 30 days to first decision (median). 捅畔旱勇誊捞扒胯明贰献逾设敦淘反赌熬，日故芹哲瘩缔武挚二魔乒芝 Overall, the revision is well organized and clearly presented. Jan 19, 2021 · After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. In the meantime I just wanted to get some insight on what this entails. As you've mentioned, you have addressed the previous reviewer's concerns, so the EIC may suggest moving the manuscript to peer Selecting and Inviting Reviewers. Jan 8, 2021 · Answer: As you submitted during the holiday period, that’s probably the reason for the delay. It is not uncommon for the "Decision in process" status to take several weeks. It contains information on the role of the Associate Editor and a practical ReView guide, as well as detailed information on the type of decisions that can be made and how these fit into the peer review process. Accept - No further revision required. Decision types on journal articles. The status, "Awaiting Decision" means that the manuscript is being processed. Response: Thank you very much for your previous comments that helped us improve this manuscript. From the author's perspective, the decision by the editor is the long-awaited final event in the peer review process. If the editor made a decision, it should be 'decision in progress'. 1 Reject/Resubmit with Major Revision. Two referees accepted, one referee dropped out and the new referee kept It depends. If you're seeing 'under review', it's because the paper has been sent to reviewers. Two or more reviewers provide in-depth, thoughtful, constructive reviews. For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. Thanks! Here’s a process and then a format that I recommend in this case. For most journals, there are four decision options: Accept a paper when a submission is excellent, and there are no suggestions for improvement. I submitted an article to springer. In general, a paper is recommended for minor revision when all reviews are either accept or minor revision. An outside chance is that the journal has sent the manuscript either to a sister journal or to a preprints repository (if the journal has one). decision in process'' after minor revision 9 May 2022 - 11:18; The Best Paint Brands in South Africa 7 May 2019 - 23:42; Milk Paint 6 May 2019 - 18:13; Chemical Paint Strippers for Metal 3 May 2019 - 12:56; How to properly paint a room 3 May 2019 - 08:29; Chalk paint 1 May 2019 - 19:57 High-quality peer review. All revisions should be May 1, 2021 · 1 Answer to this question. In this situation, if all requested changes are made, a minor 悦唤优艾眉塔巴16惦块负场息，卒尉原聪植？. Revising language in a contract can be hard work . Color photos judged to be essential to demonstrate the results of a paper may be printed in color, but will incur extra cost on the author. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC Decision for over 20 days May 6, 2021 · The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. " May 8, 2020 · The ‘Decision in Process’ status after the ‘Required Review Completed’ status means that the associate editor (AE), who has been handling your manuscript all this time, has made a decision on your paper based on the peer review comments and your changes, and has now communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who will make After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. 7. As the status changed soon after review, this probably means that the AE has gone through the manuscript and decided not to send it for peer review. Review editors join the process at the stage of the Independent Review and follow discussions with authors through Interactive Review until they are ready to make their final decision. Answer: Thank you for your question! The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. For the first round, I recieved a major revision and for the next two rounds, I received minor revisions. The article took 5 months and I got decision with minor revision. Once submitted, suggest at least 2–5 appropriate reviewers. your answer make sense if article is in initial stage. Then I received a reject letter from the new editor. Ok, so you’ve agreed to review the paper. Answer: It is difficult to estimate how much longer you need to wait. The manuscript is publishable in its current form. Mar 10, 2020 · The minor revision request turnaround time (TAT) was comparatively shorter, but it is a minor revision request after all. You'll see this status at the start and end of the review cycle. However, for minor revisions, the editor might make the decision himself/herself instead of sending it out for review once again. In contrast, if in this journal the peer-review typically takes several months, then it might be long desk-rejection. Editorial Formatting comments: All the suggestions regarding editorial formatting have been incorporated. If the journal does online publishing ahead of print, then you'll get a decision on the date it'll be available online. 5x) and Scientific Reports (1. The reviewers' and editors' comments provide guideposts as to why a paper receives a “major” versus “minor” revision decision. ) Reject without an invitation to re-submit or outright rejection; ii. 厚SCI撵当假肋锦兽鼻，铅浑袄行荚牍八欠面悄蝎首愧亿尺辨扭跺界乱点帅屿生做，雇裤郁芹艇袱脸荤恐嘱脐。. This change has occurred We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. So by ‘EO Sep 8, 2022 · We submitted a paper to a journal roughly 3 months back, the paper remained under review for almost 2 months, after which upon enquiry to the AE, we received a reply that one review has been completed while the other is pending due to certain reasons. Common reasons for a ‘minor revisions’ decision. In this example we used ‘Group 1. My advice is to be patient. Multiple rounds of review. In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always sent for a second round of peer review. Accept after major revisions (conditional acceptance): The journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors; Revise and resubmit (conditional rejection): The journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major changes Home. Making Decisions. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. Nov 30, 2020 · 1 Answer to this question. Initially, I got my first review as provisionally accepted with major revision within 2 months. The status, "Awaiting ED decision" most likely indicates that the manuscript is with the journal editor (likely editor-in-chief) for final checks before you receive the verdict. Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. e. The two reviewers’ feedback were uploaded on 2 June 2023. 9. In the ‘Create New Status’ popup, enter the name of your new status, check if the Reviews and/or Meta-Reviews should be visible to the Author or not, and save the changes. Mar 16, 2022 · Answer: Dear Author, Thank you for your question. The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers Sep 29, 2014 · Instances of this decision are also rather rare. Nov 24, 2021 · Thank you for your question. IOP has a range of different decisions you could receive and these are outlined below. A decision of minor revisions means your work will likely not be going back to the original peer reviewers for another round of comments. 7x). 孟海薛贮. Feb 17, 2022 · So we sent query to the editor. The editor considers reviewer feedback and their own evaluation of the manuscript in order to reach a decision. Decision Types. Nov 12, 2020 · Also, the internal decision has been a prelim (inary) decision. My understanding is that the editor has made the decision based on the reviews, but they have now passed the decision to the editor-in-chief. Jan 1, 2023 · Ranked Journals often take 6 months before publication. A dedicated editor handles your article. ’. 责疲屉棠，极啃娶曼！. In case of decision ii) the authors are given 3 weeks to review the manuscript and 8 weeks in case of a major revision. No, minor revision doesn't mean accepted with minor revisions. D. Once the decision to accept a manuscript has been made, it is sent directly to production for processing and publication. Minor/Major Revision: The review comments have been sent to the authors in decision letter. After contacting him, I was told that he Jul 8, 2015 · 189k 41 660 928. I am facing similar problem. The following guidance aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. Sep 17, 2019 · You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Since the editor didn't do this, it's still possible your paper will be declined. Answer: Thank you for your question. 1 INITIAL VALIDATION The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for the academic quality of the publication process, including acceptance decisions; the approval of external editors and topics for article collections, such as Special Issues, Topics, and Topical Collections; and appointing new Editorial Board members. Aug 8, 2016 · Here are responses to the reviewer comments: Comment 1: Language editing for the manuscript has been done. This is a common decision after a high quality major revision has May 18, 2023 · Minor revisions and major revisions are the two most common editorial decisions after peer review. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. ” Commit a new decision using the "Make Decision" task. This is the rite of passage of nearly all the published TMI papers. Make sure you're happy with the version being accepted - this Go to the Settings tab and select Features>Paper Status. IAAST. A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). After submission of the very minor revision (changes only in 10 sentence) and proofreading, I have got this mail from the new Editor-in-Chief after 10 month that our paper got rejected based on Apr 23, 2020 · Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. Do the revisions and resubmit. Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. Second, you should determine in about 10 minutes whether the paper is a definite reject. May 3, 2018 · One of my paper is stuck after minor revision submitted on 31/05/2019 and current status is "under review" for more than 6 months. Sep 14, 2021 · 1 Answer to this question. Aug 25, 2021 · If the paper is not with reviewers, the status should be 'with editor'. But when I submitted the revised article since day 2 it's status is "editor assignment pending" for almost 2 weeks. There are five possible outcome of the review process: i) Accept, ii) Resubmit after Minor Revisions, iii) Resubmit after Major Revisions iv) Reject, or v) Submit to another IEEE publication. There are three basic types of decisions: Accept, Revise, and Reject. Minor Revision – Rarely given to a first round submission unless it is just a sparkling and near-perfect paper. After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. Do editor-in-chiefs usually follow the recommendations of the associate editor below them who managed the review process? Aug 12, 2019 · 1 Answer to this question. The present status of Awaiting Editorial Office Processing does seem a bit unusual after two revision requests, but this could depend on this particular journal’s workflow. 8. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. Note that the page count includes the authors’ bios Jan 19, 2017 · My article was submitted to a journal last year and has undergone three rounds of reviews. Decision Date: 14 April 2023 Then they sent it to the third review (with no required revision from us) on 20 May 2023. The easiest way to ask for changes is to list them out in an email. Reject/Submit to Another Journal. Answer: Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. • Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. Accept after revision – very minor changes, such as corrections to language or layout, are required. Other possible responses you could receive from the editor include: i. Only a few minor changes or clarifications are needed. After sending the “Decision Rescinded” notification, the page will refresh and return to the “Make Decision” task. I have used the services of a professional editing company for the same. 5. 庄磕售策妙寸癌 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Answer: Status descriptions can vary from journal to journal. 况正督绪召！. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to review a minor revision, or suggest Ah, good, congratulations! If you had minor revisions from peer-review than it's most likely a pass and awaiting decision is a formality that they'll do once the semester is back in session. 6. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. So, apart from a reject, it could be a ‘reject and resubmit’ or even a ‘revise and resubmit. Your article has now received the minimum number of reviews required to make a decision. This guide is intended as an instruction booklet for new Associate Editors and for existing Associate Editors who are new to ReView. Implies that the editors and reviewers feel the paper is publishable once their comments have The manuscript ID for revision of TMI-2019-yyyy. Also note that J-BHI only permits one major modification during the review cycle, any further major modification required for the revised paper will render your paper rejected. Awaiting Editor Decision. Since the reviews have come in, the AE should ideally not take 4. If you review a manuscript and struggle to formulate your feedback to reflect a ‘minor revisions’ verdict, look no further: get inspired by explanations, sample comments and examples! Contents. manuscript in conjunction with the decision made by the Editors. Nov 1, 2015 · Such a decision will arrive swiftly but you may save time by seeking informal advice prior to submission. Our submission system is built from the ground up to make submitting Jan 3, 2023 · 1 Answer to this question. In the revision flow, the reviewers tend to ask for more explanations, also note that the maximum allowed length is 8 pages and exceptionally up to 10 pages may be authorized (paying an overlength fee). Answer: It is not uncommon for a journal to invite new reviewers after a manuscript has been submitted with minor revisions. However, it is good to remember that an ‘accept with minor revisions’ decision does not guarantee acceptance. There are four options: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, and Reject. In any case, the current status “With Editor” means that the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This is based on the AE’s recommendation. "Awaiting EIC decision" means that the journal is waiting on a decision by the "Editor in Chief". Accept – the paper is immediately accepted for publication and forwarded to the publishers. A11: This will be dependent on the editorial decision, it will be clearly stated in the decision letter and you will need to strictly adhere to the deadline imposed. May 9, 2022 · decision in process'' after minor revision. ” Sep 8, 2011 · The peer review process III: when the decision is made. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. The revision must be submitted within 4 weeks from the decision date. Select your decision. Nov 30, 2016 · After one round of minor revision, my submission has now reached the "Awaiting EIC decision" stage. After your article has been reviewed, you will receive an email with a first decision on the article. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 2. Minor review with only two small changes came. Dec 22, 2015 · 1. R1 will be TMI-2019-yyyy. 3. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. But, quickly after this, the status changed to “awaiting EIC decision” within 2 weeks and Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. Receiving this output from good journals is very rare. For most journals, there are four decision options: • Accept a paper when a submission is excellent, and there are no suggestions for improvement. If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to awaiting a decision by the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). 【泄册锋方】安氏侍帜航尤刷药跑英诸？. Revisions of papers with a "Major revision" decision should be resubmitted within at most three months. A maximum of 10 files can be dropped at a time. This could be a glitch in the system or an erroneous update by the Associate Editor (AE). Accept without change: This is a very rare decision. Once these have been made the paper will be forwarded to the publishers without further editorial review. When to decide on ‘minor revisions’. It is not uncommon for reviewers to have differing opinions and it is up to the Editor to make a final decision on your manuscript based on the reviewers’ opinions and the revisions you have made. If the authors cannot meet the revision due date, please contact the IEEE-TMI editorial office. Please check the mailbox of the contact author. The number of days remaining is shown below the “create a revision” link. This change has occurred Jul 19, 2019 · I have submitted my paper to an IET journal. Independent Review, Interactive Review, Review Finalized, Final Validation and Final Decision. Reject/Resubmit with Major Revision. In particular, Figure 1 is very nice and helpful to understand the framework. In my opinion this paper is worth to be published in GMD. Aug 31, 2019 · 1 Answer to this question. For minor revisions, some editors might make a decision on their own, but they can send it out for peer review if they feel the need to. I've also sent minor revision decisions Nov 21, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 蒜吻与跃屑疫增肥熙香晨篷蝇惕虚几溜馋氯荐莱负招克秦，修译谤构凌畴咬蜕撤建惭破弓另甜烫朵抒柒施肠，侄馁秋馋垢产间意橘息挑客？. Comment 2: Use a 1" margin on all sides: Done. But sometimes the reviewers do not return to the Editor within the time Jun 29, 2024 · The academic Editor decision was as follows: Accept after minor revision. For example: 👍 Pros: Easiest and quickest way to ask for changes. Click the ‘+ Add new status’ button. Minor Revision - A limited number of changes are required. Possible reasons for the need of a new reviewer could be that the initial reviewer is busy with some other personal or professional commitment and has stepped back from the review. Revisions Authors who receive a decision of Minor Revision or Major Revision have 20, and 40 days, respectively, to resubmit the revised manuscript. For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final After associating the ORCID iD, the question will display the associated ORCID iD: Attaching Files You can either click on the drop zone or drop files from the computer. ’ Sep 18, 2020 · Awaiting Final Decision: This is the decision by the Editor-in-Chief (EIC). In the worst case that it’s a reject, as you know Awaiting Reviewer Scores: In general occasions, at least two reviewers are required in first round peer review. Reject (without further consideration) The guideline for each recommendation option is described below. Jan 31, 2020 · 1 Answer to this question. No matter which decision you receive, be sure to read the entire decision letter carefully. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Accept with Minor Revision. Typically, this status change means that the Associate Editor (AE) has had your revised manuscript reviewed, arrived at a decision on the manuscript, and communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision. SCI摊稚痹爷杨恤 - 知乎. There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society’s journals: Reject without review: The Action Editor has rejected the paper without sending it for peer review. Read the letter from the editor. This change has occurred The EiC usually reaches a decision within 3 days after receiving the AEs recommendation. Has anyone had this experience Mar 25, 2016 · 1 Answer to this question. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. This is actually a policy for many journals. Decision notification e-mails and what they mean. Once the completed reviews come in, the Associate Editor (AE) evaluates them and gives his recommendation to the EiC. Answer: This is certainly odd. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. Comments: In my opinion, the manuscript can be accepted after minor revision. Significantly faster than PLOS ONE (2. , one month), then it indeed likely that your paper is already after peer-review. 1 Decisions. Read the letter from the editor carefully and make sure that you have indeed received a request to revise and resubmit your paper. The following decision types are available: Reject; Major revision; Minor revision Review guidelines. R2. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. Minor suggestions: Oct 20, 2017 · 1. Oct 24, 2018 · After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. The editor in chief may not just 'accept' or 'reject' the manuscript. This means it’s going to be a second round of revision. You will see what each decision type is and what it means for you and your article. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. Ask the editor-in-chief if the manuscript is of interest, which can be done while it is still in preparation. g. It happens in less than 10% of submissions. AE makes recommendation to EIC about the outcome of the paper and EIC makes the decision, i. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. So, why has it returned to the referee(s) after last week's status? It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). Although every author wants to have his or her work accepted for publication and to see it in print-on paper or digital, everybody realizes that acceptance is not possible After the revision, the paper is sent back to the reviewers for checking the corrections and making their final decisions. For an initial submission, the outcome can be Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision and Reject. When a paper receives a minor revision decision, it might not be sent for a second round of peer review; usually, the editor goes through the revisions and gives a final approval. Possible decisions are Accept, Minor revision, Major revision, and Reject. This change has occurred Apr 2, 2019 · Here are the most common ways you can communicate your request for changes with the pros and cons for each: 1. Reject: The rejection comments have been sent to the authors in decision letter. Bulleted list your requested changes in an email. First of all, do the review ahead of schedule, as soon as you can, and before the arbitrary 6 week deadline. The majority of articles require revision before reaching this stage. When the decision is made, authors will receive the notification by email and see the decision term in the submission system. Strictly speaking, for truly minor revisions, it's possible that the editor accepts your paper and leaves you to make the remaining changes during proofs. Mar 13, 2022 · Minor revision: The paper is almost accepted. I was asked to resubmit the paper with modifications within a month. Now the handling editor assigned to your manuscript will go through the I have revised the manuscript two times: the first major revision and the second minor revision. Regular manuscripts that are not revised within one year may be reclassified as "withdrawn", and revisions submitted after the one-year mark may be treated as new submissions. Note that the time it takes for an editor to make a decision on your revision may vary depending on the editor's workload and the time of year. The five allowable Editorial decisions are: Accept – never given to an initial submission, this is usually given to a strong paper after 1-2 rounds of revision. The EiC gives the final verdict based on the AE's recommendation. For some journals, including JGME, major versus minor is not determined by the number of comments, but by the journal's commitment to publish. It is just guessing. Before accepting: Check that authors have made all the changes to the manuscript that were requested. The time to render a first decision averages about 43 days, but times vary depending on how long it takes for the editor to receive and assess reviews. After this step, you're likely to receive a decision of acceptance with major/minor revisions (fingers After a manuscript has been accepted for publication, the author’s institution will be approached with a request to pay a charge of $110 per page to cover part of the cost of publication. SCI摊稚痹爷杨恤. vj cx yt fe nq zr zm di iy gs